Innocent Executed - no Proof. Opponents claim lots of innocent man are wrongly executed. There has never been any proof of an innocent man being executed!! However, this study is very controversial. Studies like Markman and Cassell find that the methodology was flawed in l2 cases.
There was no substantial evidence of guilt, and no evidence of innocence. Moreover, our judicial system takes extra precautions to be sure the innocent and their rights are protected.
Most likely an innocent person would not be executed Internet. Death Penalty Saves Lives. The question is whether or not execution of an innocent person is strong enough to abolish the death penalty.
Remember, the death penalty saves lives. Repeat murders are eliminated and foreseeable murders are deterred. You must consider the victim as well as the defendant. Hugo Bedau claims: The execution of the innocent believed guilty is a.
But such miscarriage of justice do not. Most human activities like. Death Penalty - Right to Live. Opponents say the State is like a murder himself. The argument here is, if execution is murder, than killing someone in war is murder. Our country should stop fighting wars. Is arresting someone same as kidnapping someone? In the same, executing someone is not murder, it is punishment by society for a deserving criminal. Bedau states one popular objection to Capital punishment is that it gratifies the desire for revenge regarding as unworthy.
He thus legitimized vengeance and reserved it to Himself. Religious tradition certainly suggest no less p. All religions believe having life is sacred. Death Penalty Deterrent Effect. If we do not know whether the death penalty will deter others, we will be confronted with two uncertainties. If we have the death penalty and achieve no deterrent effect, than, the life of convicted murderers has been expended in vain from a deterrent point of view —here is a net loss.
If we have the death sentence, and deter future murderers, we spared the lives of future victims- the prospective murderers gain, too; they are spared punishment because they were deterred. In this case, the death penalty is a gain, unless the convicted murderer is valued more highly than that of the unknown victim, or victims Carrington, F. Justice requires punishing the guilty even if only some can be punished and sparing the innocent, even if all are not spared.
Morally, justice must always be preferred to equality. Justice cannot ever permit sparing some guilty person, or punishing some innocent ones, for the sake of equality—because others have been spared or punished. In practice, penalties could never be applied if we insisted that they can be inflicted on only a guilty person unless we are able to make sure that they are equally applied to all other guilty persons.
The penalty must be appropriate to the seriousness of the crime p. They were prison guards and inmates. An Eye for an Eye. Some people argue that the capital punishment tends to brutalize and disregards society. The difference between punishment and the crime is that one is legalized and the other is not! People are more brutalized by what they see on T. Could the same effect be achieved by putting the criminal in prison for life?
The death penalty is the only actually irrevocable penalty. Because of that, it is the one that people fear the most Isenberg, I. Today, there are many pros and cons to this death penalty issues. As a matter of fact, most people in the U. But we need more states to enforce the death penalty. As you may have read in the arguments, the death penalty help to curtail future murderers, thus, we can save more lives. In my opinion, I am in favor of the death penalty, because we can save innocent lives.
Life to me is scared as Professor Haag stated. The people on death row can watch T. At first, I felt very sorry for her, but after doing research on her, I learned she had five husbands.
She had already killed the fourth one, and served a prison sentence for murder, and she got out of prison early. Betty Beets was imprisoned a second time, and now was pleading for her life? It has been proven these killers do it again and again. The rate of recidivism is high for people who commit murder and crimes. We need stricter laws and swift death penalty. One of the woman came forward and told me how her husband shot and killed her five year-old daughter which she witnessed on her birthday.
Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain Bosner ; this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer. Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible.
The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment. Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form.
After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid. Another argument put forth by death penalty abolitionists is the possibility of executing an innocent person. Many people that argue this overestimate how often this happens, it is an extremely rare occurrence and has not happened since the death penalty was reintroduced in Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof.
We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. Stewart points out that death penalty cases are held to a much higher standard. Due process in these cases takes much longer so that the court can be absolutely sure that the person is guilty before sentencing him to execution.
This helps to eliminate any errors that could lead to executing the wrong person. He also points out that although there is a small possibility for mistakes to be made, this does not mean capital punishment should be abolished. If everything that had the potential for harmful mistakes were outlawed, society would be extremely crippled. It is true that there is disproportionality when it comes to the races and classes that most frequently receive the death penalty. It has been proven that minorities and those with lower income levels are overrepresented on death row.
This is not due to discrimination; this is due to the higher rate at which these groups commit crime ProCon. It has been argued that poverty breeds criminality; if this is true then it makes sense that those at a lower income level would more frequently be sentenced to execution than those at higher income levels ProCon.
It has also been proven that minorities are disproportionately poor, and therefore they would also be more likely to receive the death penalty. Ernest van den Haag said it best:. The only relevant question is: Whether or not others deserved the same punishment, whatever the economic or racial group, have avoided execution is irrelevant. It does not matter what race or economic status a person is, if he is guilty he must receive the appropriate punishment, which in some cases may be the death penalty.
Capital punishment can be a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it. The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral.
The arguments against the death penalty often do not hold up when examined more closely. It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not. The death penalty can be an extremely useful tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society.
It is imperative that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly. The Case for Justice. Death Penalty Curricula for High School. Death Penalty Information Center. This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 24th, at 5: You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.
You can leave a comment , or trackback from your own site. You must be logged in to post a comment. Ernest van den Haag, a professor at Fordham University, wrote about the issue of deterrence: One of many arguments that people make in support of the death penalty is that it would eliminate the overpopulated prison problem.
There are over This inevitable increase in population will take money directly out of the hands of taxpayers and the government, leading to the next intrinsic topic, money. This rate is thousands of dollars above the national poverty line for Recidivism High , 1.
As previously stated, with the rising American population this will eventually lead to more criminals and more money out of the pockets of taxpayers to provide for these inmates. It is projected that the death penalty could solve the problem of overcrowded prisons, but from a holistic view this issue is not a primary concern.
An extremely important and uprising issue supporting the death penalty is that it saves lives. Of the roughly 52, state prison inmates serving time for murder in , an estimated had previously been convicted of murder and had killed persons following their previous murder convictions. Executing each of these inmates would have saved lives Stanford Law Review , Relating to the previous paragraph murderers have been released from prison and taken the lives of thousands of people, additionally.
However, according to statistics this is no surprise. These statistics go to show that if a murderer is released back into society there is a high probability of them committing crimes or even murder again.
DEATH PENALTY AND SENTENCING INFORMATION In the United States 10/1/97 By Dudley Sharp, Death Penalty Resources Director, Justice For All The death penalty .
Death penalty opponents however feel that the death penalty actually leads to an increase in crime because the death penalty desensitizes people to violence, and it sends the message that violence is a suitable way to resolve conflicts.
Jan 19, · I've started writing a pro-capital punishment paper. I'm still in the process of adding to it and modifying it (as well as making sure none of it is plagiarised) so please let me know if you see anything that stands out as needing change (either adding new ideas, modifying, or removing) or if something is plagiarised. though I think I . And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence.” (Death Penalty Curricula for High School).
Pro Death Penalty Essay Words 4 Pages Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in the United States. In May of , a recent study on the death penalty found that 65 percent of the US supports the death penalty (Farrell). With that amount of people supporting the death penalty, there should be no problem putting murderers to death because the majority likes the death penalty.